The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc.

Sumner Group: Ionization Technique

Mass Spectrometry · Isotope Table

Thermospray Ionization

The early 1980s spawned many new ionization techniques to push mass spectrometry into the analysis of polar, labile, and nonvolatile species. A significant advancement was made when Blakely and Vestal[31] introduced the thermospray ionization source (TSP) which was capable of producing ions from an aqueous solution that had been sprayed directly into the mass spectrometer. TSP ionization is achieved by passing a pressurized solution through a heated tube which partially vaporizes the effluent to generate a spray prior to entering the ion source. Droplets from the spray contain a statistical imbalance of charges originating from charged solutes present in the solution. The droplets gradually decrease in size by evaporation of neutral solvent molecules until the droplet reaches a size at which the charge repulsion forces overcome the cohesive forces of the droplet. According to the "charged-residue" model, subsequent Coulomb explosions result in droplets containing a single solute molecule that accumulates charge as the remaining solvent is evaporated.[32,33] Another view of the process is the "ion evaporation" model, in which the analyte ion is ejected from the droplet to alleviate the high electrical potential produced as the solvent evaporates.[34] Ion evaporation is enhanced through the addition of buffers to the mobile phases with the most common being 0.1 M ammonium acetate. Similar to FAB and MALDI, thermospray ionization is considered a soft ionization technique and generates charged analytes through cation attachment. When using ammonium buffers, the most pronounced pseudo-molecular ion observed is the [M+NH4]+ ion but often one can still observe the [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+ ions. In addition, fragment ions can be observed due to the high temperatures associated with TSP. Negative ions are also produced by TSP, and negative ion detection is recommended for acidic compounds. Although the TSP interface maintains heated regions up to 200oC, the ions are somewhat shielded from these high temperatures through evaporative cooling. TSP has also found tremendous use as a liquid introduction technique for higher flow-rate LC/MS but its utility has faded as APCI has become more popular. TSP has also found utility in reaction monitoring and studies of reaction kinetics.

Electrospray Ionization

Soon after the introduction of TSP, the electrospray ionization (ESI) source was presented by Yamashita and Fenn. [35] This liquid introduction technique uses a high electric field (3-5 kV/cm) to produce a fine mist of highly charged droplets. These charged droplets are thought to produce analyte ions through the same ion evaporation process discussed above in the TSP section. Positive or negative ions can be produced, but a stable negative ion current is more difficult to maintain due to an increased propensity toward electric discharge at the electrospray needle tip. ESI differs from TSP in the fact that it uses a high potential to impose a charge in place of the buffers used in TSP. This high potential has the unique advantage of being able to generate multiply charged ions. This is of significant utility since all mass analyzers differentiate on the basis of mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). By detecting multiply charged ions the effective mass range can be extended. For example, it is not uncommon for a 20,000 Da protein to be able to maintain 20 charges. For positive ion mode, the charges arise from cation adduct formation and the maximum charge state is dictated by the number of cation attachment sites, basic residues, and the geometry of the molecule. [35] The 20 kDa ion with 20 charges can therefore be detected at m/z = 1001 (20,000 + 20H+ / 20 = 1001). This example illustrates how the effective mass range of m/z=1200 quadrupole can be extended to detect large proteins or other biomolecules. For more details, an extensive review discussing the principles of electrospray and its applications to the ionization of large polypeptides and proteins has been presented by Smith and co-workers. [36]


Ion Formation by ESI

ESI can be extremely sensitive and capable of detecting fmol to atmol quantities. This sensitivity has pushed ESI to the foreground of liquid introduction techniques. Its utility ranges to many analytes including biomolecules, organic acids and bases, organometallics, metal complexes, natural products, and many others. True ESI is performed at a much lower flow rate than TSP (1-50 µL/min) but has many nebulization assisted variations to accommodate higher flow rates. Solubility of the analyte sample is essential for successful ESI analysis. Volatile polar solvents such as alcohols give the best ESI results.

Electron Ionization (EI) Analysis

Electron ionization (EI), is the oldest and most established of the ionization techniques. Electron, ionization is achieved through the interaction of an analyte with an energetic electron beam that results in the loss of an electron from the analyte and the production of a radical cation.

M + e- --> M+ + 2e-

EI is the most appropriate technique for relatively small (m.w.<700) neutral organic molecules which can easily be promoted to the gas phase by heating without decomposition, i.e. volatile. Since EI samples are thermally desorbed to the gas phase and subjected to the high energy of EI, analytes must be both thermally and energetically stable. Traditionally a major percentage of the analytes ionized by EI are not completely energetically stable and a portion of the analytes break apart or fragment as a relaxation pathway to remove the excess internal energy obtained during ionization. Fragmentation is not necessarily a bad thing since fragmentation provides structural information as well as a "finger print" means of identification. The EI ionizing energy typically used is 70 eV to promote the greatest sensitivity and to produce molecular and fragment ions used for chemical characterization and identification. Generally, the electron energy is variable between 0 and 100 eV. The ionization energy can be lowered to 15-30 eV in order to reduce fragmentation and/or permit the observation of molecular ions of more energetically labile species. However, reducing the ionizing energy reduces the overall ionization efficiency/sensitivity significantly[1], and as a result, requires more sample than at 70 eV.


Electron Ionization (EI) Analysis

Several books on basic interpretation of electron ionization mass spectra are available.[6,7] Reference libraries of mass spectra, in the form of the NIH/EPA Mass Spectral database and others, are available.[8] Two printed copies of the NIH/EPA Mass Spectral Database (Standard mass spectra of approximately 44,000 compounds) are available in the Laboratory, as well as being available for computer search. A copy of the Wiley Registry containing over 125,000 compounds is also available for searching of EI mass spectra online. Additional references that might be helpful to data interpretation are provided.[9-11] The book, Mass Spectrometry of Organic Compounds,[11] is an encyclopedic collection of fragmentation rules on a wide variety of classes of organic compounds and might also be helpful.

Chemical ionization (CI) Analysis

Chemical ionization[12,13] evolved as a means to ionize compounds to energetically labile for traditional EI analysis. Conceptionally, CI can be thought of as EI performed in the presence of a large excess of a reagent gas. The excess reagent gas is more likely to interact with the EI electron beam than the analyte. Munsen and Field reported that an analyte present in a relatively small amount (1:1,000) in a gas plasma (reagent gas) generated by EI underwent gas-phase acid/base types of reactions, i.e. proton transfer.[12] The gas-phase chemical reactions result in the removal or donation of a charged species (generally H+) from the reagent gas to the analyte to yield a pseudo-molecular ion (positively or negatively charged). The probability of proton exchange is based on the gas phase basicities and proton affinities of the analyte and the reagent gas.

M + [Reagent gas + H]+ --> [M + H]+ + Reagent gas
M + [Reagent gas - H]- --> [M - H]- + Reagent gas

The reaction energies of the gas-phase acid/base reactions are approximately 5 to 10 eV, which is significantly lower than EI. The lower energy ionization associated with CI results in more abundant molecular ions. Although CI is capable of generating molecular weight information from labile species, it still requires that the sample be volatile which could hinder the detection of thermally unstable analytes. Typical reagent gases used in CI are methane, isobutane, ammonia, and hydrogen. An extended list is provided by Watson.[1] CI is most applicable to analytes that are moisture sensitive and/or reactive with hydroxyl groups present in many common FAB matrices.


Chemical Ionization Schematic

Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry

Basic information regarding the GC/MS experiment has been reported.[14,15] This technique allows for the on-line separation of complex mixtures of volatile species (nonvolatile if derivatized) followed immediately by mass selective detection. GC/MS provides a higher degree of specificity than traditional GC detectors and has been extensively utilized in environmental, petroleum, synthetic organic, and biological applications. Most modern GC/MS experiments are performed using capillary chromatographic columns to minimize pumping requirements of the mass spectrometers and to exploit the higher separation efficiencies of these smaller diameter columns. Capillary GC columns are utilized for their high resolving power since these columns can have plate numbers in excess of 100,000 per meter. These columns are typically 30 meters in length, internal diameters of approximately 250 mm, and coatings of < 1 µm. Most GC/MS analyses are performed using EI, but GC/MS using CI ionization can be performed but is more difficult.

Fast Atom Bombardment

Fast atom bombardment (FAB) as a mechanism for ionization was first described in the scientific literature in 1982[16-18] and rapidly became a very successful technique in mass spectrometry. FAB reached this elevated level of popularity by providing an efficient means to analyze polar, ionic, thermally labile, energetically labile, and high molecular weight compounds that are not amenable to normal EI/CI analysis. Thus, FAB found an extreme utility in the analysis of polar biomolecules and natural products. Ionic compounds can be analyzed by FAB, whereas they are intractable by EI. Depending upon whether the cation or the anion is of interest, either positive-ion or negative-ion FAB/MS analyses can be performed.

In the FAB experiment, a sample that has been dissolved in a suitable matrix [19-21] is inserted into the mass spectrometer and bombarded with 4-10 keV Ar or Xe atoms. The use of a liquid matrix yields more intense and longer-lived analyte signals than those generated by solid state, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS).

Following ionization, the selected positive or negative ions are extracted, accelerated, and then mass analyzed. The FAB mass spectrum is characterized by peaks corresponding to matrix cluster ions, analyte ions, ions representing impurities, and ions of other matrix modifiers (e.g., trifluoroacetic acid) that were added in an attempt to increase the analyte ion abundance. The observed positive pseudo-molecular ion peaks are typically adducts formed with cations (i.e., [M+H]+ and [M+Na]+), whereas typical negative pseudo-molecular ions observed are [M-H]-. These adduct ions are generated by desorption of pre-formed ions in solution and/or gas phase cation exchange similar to that described in the CI section.

Liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry (LSIMS) is a similar particle desorption technique to FAB and differs only in the nature of its primary particle source. LSIMS uses a higher enegy primary ION beam (generally 10 to 50 keV Cs+) whereas FAB uses neutral Ar or Xe as the primary particle. Higher energies are used to compenstate for deaccleration of the charged primary particle as it enters the electrostatic field of the ion source. Early beliefs were that use of charged primary particles would induce detrimental charging of the electrically isolated or "floated" probe resulting in undesireable electrical discharges, however time has shown that LSIMS has several advantages over FAB including lower source pressures due to origination of the primary ion by thermal desorption of a solid as apposed to a gas fed saddle field gun used in FAB. The LSIMS source also has the added advantage of focusing and steering of the charged primary particle beam using electrostatic potentials that do not affect the neutral FAB particles.

Successful ionization by FAB is deeply dependent on the matrix selected for the analysis. The successful matrix must meet several requirements. The primary requirement is that the sample MUST be soluble in the matrix. In addition, the matrix must be a low volatility solvent which will not rapidly evaporate in the high vacuum system of the mass spectrometer. Thus, the matrix/sample will maintain its liquid nature in the vacuum system. Cook and coworkers [20] discuss the physical and chemical properties of common matrices while Gower [21] presents a summary of matrices reported in the literature and the compound classes with which they have been successful. Several successful matrices which have been widely used are glycerol, thioglycerol, m-nitrobenzyl alcohol, 18 -crown-6 crown ether, 2-nitrophenyloctyl ether, sulfolane, diethanolamine, and triethanolamine. Fenselau and Cotter summarize the mechanisms and fundamentals of FAB in a recent review.[22]

Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight

A relatively new ionization technique is matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization, more commonly referred to as MALDI. This desorption technique first introduced in 1988 by Hillenkamp and co-workers[25] is very similar to FAB, but it utilizes photons instead of particles to desorb analyte molecular ions, [M+H]+, from a crystalline matrix. The primary role of the matrix is to absorb the incident radiation which results in rapid heating of the crystal lattice on a time scale (femtoseconds) that is faster than thermal equilibration of the matrix-analyte lattice. This process results in desorptionor transfer to the gas phase of matrix and intact analyte ions. The process responsible for ionization is still under current investigation and discussion but revolves around cation transfer similar to CI and FAB. MALDI, utilized in conjunction with time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry, has the ability to generate molecular ions from pmol to fmol quantities of species with molecular weights in excess of 100 kDa. This is a very distinct advantage over FAB performed on magnetic sector instruments. The capability of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to analyze such large molecules has found a high degree of usefulness in the analysis of high mass biomolecules[27-29]. The resolution limitation of TOF mass spectrometry is the only limiting factor of this technique, but this limitation is quickly decreasing due to advances in instrumental technologies.[30] To date, we have successfully utilized MALDI-TOF to study molecules such as large peptides and porphoryn based molecules.


MALDI Desorption/Ionization