Many hunters and deer managers in our area have accepted the necessity of doe harvest to effectively manage toward the common deer management goal of increasing buck body and antler size. Some, however, still object to this practice. I have found the "no doe harvest" mindset to derive from two arguments. Let's examine each from a biological perspective.
Argument No. 1. Don't shoot does, because they produce buck fawns! Fallacies in the argument:
Argument No. 2. Doe hunting isn't "macho"! Bucks are wary; does are dumb! Fallacies in the argument:
The only reason to protect does is to increase the number of deer on a management unit. The majority of managers we work with are interested in increasing the quality of bucks. Unless deer are at low densities (unusual for our area), protecting does will not accomplish this objective.
Provide feedback to other users and the author(s) by completing the information below.