|
Workshop Abstracts
| Virus Evolution Home Page |
Plant Biology Home Page
Genetic variability of plant virus
populations
Fernando García-Arenal,
Aurora Fraile and José M. Malpica1
Depto. de Biotecnología, E.T.S.I. Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica
de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain, and
1 Area de Protección Vegetal, CIT-INIA, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Introduction
Plant viruses are the cause of important diseases of crop plants, which result
in diminished production and may even compromise food supply in large areas.
The only direct way of controlling virus-induced diseases of plants is by the
use of genetic resistance, a strategy in which success can be compromised by
the evolution in the virus populations of virulence on the used resistant factors.
A vast majority of plant viruses have single-stranded RNA genomes, and since
the late 1970s work with RNA viruses that infect bacteria and mammals has shown
the large potential for variation of RNA genomes (Domingo and Holland, 1988).
Hence the importance of analyzing the genetic variability and structure of virus
populations under natural conditions. While there is a fairly large amount of
data on the evolution of plant viruses under experimental conditions (Roossinck,
1997), work on natural populations is much scarcer (García-Arenal et
al., 1999a). Here we present some of our past and current results on the genetic
structure and variation of plant virus populations that may be of general interest
to those interested in virus evolution.
Plant virus populations are not
very diverse
Work at our laboratory with the tobamovirus pepper mild mottle virus (PMMV),
infecting pepper crops, and tobacco mild green mosaic virus (TMGMV), infecting
the wild plant Nicotiana glauca Grah. showed that their populations in
South Eastern Spain were not very diverse but, rather, indicated high genetic
conservation for these viruses (Rodríguez-Cerezo et al., 1989, 1991).
Population diversity values were similar for both viruses (Table 1), in spite
of the fact that PMMV infects an annual crop plant in which resistance genes
are used for its control, and resistance-breaking strains occur in the population,
while TMGMV infects a perennial wild plant. Moreover, the analysis of TMGMV
populations infecting N. glauca in regions as distant as Spain, California
or Australia showed that population diversity did not increase with the geographic
scale of the sample. In all cases diversities were low, similar to those reported
for bacteria, and much lower than for some animal viruses such as influenza
A or foot and mouth disease viruses (Fraile et al., 1996). When the limited
data available for other plant viruses are analyzed, it is apparent that genetic
conservation is the rule for plant viruses, irrespective of the nature of their
genome (RNA or DNA), the replication strategy or the life history (Table 1).
Moreover, since complementation of deleterious variants may be very effective
(Moreno et al., 1997) these figures are upper estimates.
Low genetic diversity might result
from low mutation rates or/and small population size. No estimate for the mutation
rate of a plant virus has been published. Our preliminary results on the estimation
of the mutation rate of tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), a virus closely related
to PMMV and TMGMV, show a mutation rate in the range of those reported for animal
or bacterial RNA viruses (Drake et al., 1998). Thus, low mutation rates seem
not to be the cause for low genetic diversity in plant virus populations.
Functional constraints to the
variation of virus-encoded proteins
There are no estimates on the effective population size for a plant virus. There
are data, though, on a second factor that may restrict genetic diversity, i.e.
purifying selection associated to the maintenance of a functional RNA structure
or to a functional encoded protein. Table 2 shows the value of the ratio of
nucleotide diversity at non-synonymous and synonymous sites, an estimate of
the degree of purifying selection, for several proteins encoded by plant RNA
and DNA viruses. Ratios vary largely for different genes, irrespective of their
function, but are in the range of those for moderately conserved eukaryotic
proteins (García-Arenal et al., 1999). Thus, in spite of higher mutation
rates, viral proteins are not more variable than those of their eukaryotic hosts.
It could well be speculated that since viral proteins interact with those of
their hosts for different functions, this results in limits to their variation.
Constraints to variation may be such
that plant RNA viruses, as has been reported for some animal viruses (Domingo
and Holland, 1997), might be near a mutational meltdown threshold. This is suggested
by early experiments on the frequency of lethal mutants of TMV after treatment
with nitrous acid (Gieber and Mundry, 1958). Mutational meltdown may also occur
in nature and have an important role in virus evolution. This is what indicates
our work with TMV and TMGMV infecting N. glauca plants in New South Wales
(Fraile et al., 1997a). Both TMV and TMGMV were isolated from herbarium specimens
of this host plant collected prior to 1950, but only TMGMV was isolated from
more recent specimens. Gene sequences of these isolates showed that although
the TMGMV population did not increase in genetic diversity with time, the TMV
population did. It was also shown that TMGMV accumulation in N. glauca
was the same in single infections and in mixed infections with TMV, while TMV
attained only one tenth the concentration in plants doubly-infected with TMGMV
than in single infected plants. Thus, the drop of TMV concentration in doubly
infected plants may go below a threshold in which elimination of deleterious
mutations became increasingly difficult, so that its population will progressively
be dominated by less fit genomes, and will succumb.
Genetic exchange may also be limited
in virus populations
Phylogenetic analyses show that genetic exchange by recombination or by reassortment
of genomic segments may have an important role in virus evolution (Rossinck,
1997, García-Arenal et al., 1999a). Reassortment has also been invoked
as a main process to avoid the accumulation of deleterious mutations, which
could compensate in RNA viruses for the biological cost of segmented genomes
(Chao, 1988). Data from experiments with different plant viruses with segmented
genomes show that reassortment is not random, indicating selection for or against
some genetic types (reviewed in García-Arenal et al., 1999). Our work
with natural populations of cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) shows that genetic exchange
is not favored for this virus (Fraile et al., 1997b; García-Arenal et
al., 1999b). The analysis of about 300 field CMV isolates, representing 17 subpopulations
in different locations and years shows that the population is largely built
of two main genetic types, belonging to subgroup I of CMV strains. Isolates
representing mixed infections between these two main types are 16% of total,
what is a lower estimate of mixed infections in the field. Reassortants, and
recombinants at RNA 3, between both genetic types are about 4% of the population,
in both cases. In addition, the different reassortant and recombinant types
appear just in only one subpopulation, and never become fixed in the CMV population.
Thus, data indicate that reassortment is not a process of genetic exchange preferred
to recombination for this virus with a segmented genome. Also, heterologous
genetic combinations are not favored in the CMV population. The mechanisms underlying
this fact are presently under analysis at our laboratory.
Conclusions
The limited available data on the genetic structure and variation of plant virus
populations gives a picture of genetic stability, rather than diversity, for
both RNA and DNA viruses. A main factor in low genetic diversity seems to be
negative selection associated to the maintenance of the sequence of the encoded
proteins. Selective constraints may also limit genetic exchange by reassortment
or recombination. More data on these subjects and, particularly on the estimation
of other basic parameters in virus evolution, such as mutation and recombination
rates, population numbers or bottlenecks in virus epidemiology are needed.
References
Chao, L. 1988. Evolution of sex in RNA viruses. J.Theor.Biol. 133:99-112.
Domingo E., and J.J. Holland.
1997. RNA virus mutations and fitness for survival. Ann.Rev.Microbiol. 51:
151-178.
Domingo E., and J.J. Holland.
1988. High error rates, population equilibrium, and evolution of RNA replication
systems. In: E.Domingo, J.J.Holland & P.Ahlquist (Eds.) "RNA genetics, Vol
III", pp. 3-35. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Drake J.W., B. Charlesworth, B.
Charlesworth, and J.F. Crow (1998). Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics
148:1667-1686.
Fraile A., J.M. Malpica, M.A.
Aranda, E. Rodríguez-Cerezo, and F. García-Arenal. 1996. Genetic
diversity in tobacco mild green mosaic tobamovirus infecting the wild plant
Nicotiana gauca. Virology 223:148-155.
Fraile A., F. Escriu, M.A. Aranda,
J.M. Malpica, J.M. Gibbs, and F. García-Arenal. 1997a. A century
of tobamovirus evolution in an Australian population of Nicotiana glauca.
J.Virol. 71:8316-8320.
Fraile A., J.L. Alonso-Prados,
M.A. Aranda, J.J. Bernal, J.M. Malpica, and F. García-Arenal. 1997b.
Genetic exchange by recombination or reassortment is infrequent in natural populations
of a tripartite RNA plant virus. J.Virol. 71:934-940.
García-Arenal F., A. Fraile,
J.M. Malpica (1999a). Genetic Variability and Evolution. In: C.L.Mandahar
(ed.), "Molecular Biology of Plant Viruses", pp. 143-159, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Boston.
García-Arenal F., F. Escriu,
M.A. Aranda, J.L. Alonso-Prados, J. M. Malpica, and A. Fraile.1999b. Molecular
epidemiology of cucumber mosaic virus and its satellite RNA. Virus Res. (in
press).
Gierer A., and K.W. Mundry.
1858. Production of mutants of tobacco mosaic virus by chemical alteration of
its ribonucleic acid in vitro. Nature 182:1457-1458.
Moreno I., J.M. Malpica, E. Rodríguez-Cerezo,
and F. García-Arenal. 1997. A mutation in tomato aspermy cucumovirus
that abolishes cell-to-cell movement is maintained to high levels in the viral
RNA population by complementation. J.Virol. 71:9157-9162.
Rodríguez-Cerezo E., A.
Moya, and F. García-Arenal. 1989. Variability and evolution of the
plant RNA virus pepper mild mottle virus. J.Virol 63: 2198-2203.
Rodríguez-Cerezo E., S.F.
Elena, A. Moya, and F. García-Arenal. 1991. High genetic stability
in natural populations of the plant RNA virus tobacco mild green mosaic virus.
J.Mol.Evol. 32:328-332.
Roossinck, M.J. (1997). Mechanisms
of plant virus evolution. Annu.Rev.Phytopathol. 35:191-209.
Table 1.- Intrapopulation
nucleotide diversities in some plant viruses a)
|
Virus b)
|
Diversity
value
|
Estimated
from
|
|
|
PMMV
|
0.018
|
Rnase T1 fragment analysis
|
| |
|
|
|
TMGMV
|
|
|
|
Spain
|
0.022
|
Rnase
T1 fragment analysis |
|
Spain
|
0.020
|
Sequence
analysis |
|
Australia
|
0.022
|
Sequence
analysis |
|
World
|
0.057
|
Sequence
analysis |
| |
|
|
|
WSMV
|
0.031
|
RFLP analysis
|
| |
|
|
|
CMV-satRNA
|
0.064
|
RPA analysis
|
| |
|
|
|
BCTV
|
|
|
|
CHF
|
0.026
|
RFLP
analysis |
|
Worland
|
0.021
|
RFLP
analysis |
| |
|
|
|
CLCuV
|
|
|
|
CP
|
0.019
|
RFLP
analysis |
|
AC1
|
0.024
|
RFLP
analysis |
|
a) From García-Arenal
et al (1999a)
b) PMMV = Pepper mild mottle virus, TMGMV = Tobacco mild green
mosiac virus, WSMV = wheat streak mosaic virus, CMV-satRNA = satellite RNA of
cucumber mosiac virus, BCTV = Beet curly top virus, CLCuV = Cotton leaf curl
virus.
Table 2.- Nucleotide diversities
in some virus genes a)
|
Virus b)
|
Gene
|
dNS
|
dS
|
dNS/dS
|
|
|
TMGMV
|
183k
|
0.012
|
0.052
|
0.230
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CMV
|
1a
|
0.006
|
0.301
|
0.020
|
|
|
2a
|
0.007
|
0.222
|
0.032
|
|
|
Coat protein
|
0.004
|
0.086
|
0.050
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
PVA
|
Coat protein
|
0.014
|
0.073
|
0.206
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
PVY
|
Coat protein
|
0.027
|
0.238
|
0.115
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CLCuV
|
AC1
|
0.076
|
0.505
|
0.150
|
|
|
Coat protein
|
0.021
|
0.556
|
0.048
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
CaMV
|
Coat protein
|
0.016
|
0.143
|
0.115
|
|
a) From García-Arenal
et al (1999a).
b) TMGMV = tobacco mild green mosaic virus, CMV = Cucumber mosaic
virus, PVA = Potato virus A, PVY = Potato virus Y, CLCuV= Cotton leaf curl virus,
CaMV = casliflower mosaic virus.
Abstract - Presented at the Virus
Evolution Workshop
Ardmore, OK
October 21 - 24th, 1999
Virus
Evolution Workshop - Main Page
Poster Presentations
To contact the organizers:
e-mail: mroossinck@noble.org
Dr. Marilyn Roossinck
Plant Biology Division
The Noble Foundation
P.O. Box 2180
Ardmore, OK 73402
phone: 580 224-6630
|