|
Adequate cover, space, food and proper arrangement of these components are essential
to developing good bobwhite quail habitat, says Noble Foundation wildlife specialist
Russell Stevens. He adds that Dr. Dale Rollins' "Softball Throw Rule of Thumb"
and Grant Huggins' "50:50 Model" often are cited as conceptual ways
of thinking about how to address the cover component for bobwhite quail.
"When applied, both of these concepts will yield 5 percent to 20 percent
brush coverage on quail range, which is what most biologists agree is the minimum
needed for bobwhite quail, assuming it is comprised of woody species that provide
suitable structure," Stevens says. "Shrubby, woody plants provide
many benefits for bobwhites: protection from predators, shelter from winter
weather, shade in the summer and, in some instances, food."
Quail enthusiasts understand how important it is to manage cover for quail
and have little difficulty applying the concepts mentioned above. However, there
are land managers who are interested in multiple uses for their land and want
to include quail for personal enjoyment or an additional source of income, but
have difficulty understanding how these concepts may affect their operations,
particularly livestock (cattle) production.
In this instance, Stevens uses a visual of the Huggins' 50:50 Model to illustrate.
The figure is drawn to scale, i.e., each grid equals one acre and each motte
is 50 feet in diameter.
"With a quick glance at the figure, what do you think the percentage of
brush is on this property? Alarmingly high? Let me tell you, it is difficult
for many managers to visualize on their property, especially those with cattle
and forage as their primary interest," Stevens says.
The figure is a depiction of 63 acres with little brush cover for quail. By
applying the 50:50 Model, the number of 50-foot mottes per acre equals about
two. Therefore, using two roughly equal-spaced mottes per acre (except for the
one displaced by the pond), the formula for determining the percent brush cover
on this property would be:
125 x 1,963.5* = 245,437.5 / 2,744,280** = .0894 x 100 = 8.9%
* 1963.5 is the number of square feet in each 50-foot diameter motte.
** 2,744,280 is the total number of square feet in the 63-acre property.
"So, did you guess less than 15 percent? If you did, at first glance you
are better than most," Stevens says. "I would bet that most would
guess 40 percent or higher and think there is no way that will work while trying
to produce cattle."
The bottom line is that the actual amount of brush is not as much as it appears
to be. Also, keep in mind that using half this number of brush mottes per acre
(1 motte) results in 4.5 percent brush cover, near the 5 percent minimum that
some biologists believe necessary to sustain bobwhite.
How would this example affect cattle production, assuming a 1,000-acre property
with native grasses and forbs good enough to support one cow per 10 acres? That
would be 100 head of cows or their equivalent. Suppose the owner wants to have
quail for personal use or as an additional source of income. If two 50-foot
mottes of brush per acre were established, 89 acres (1,000 x 8.9% = 89) would
be devoted to quail cover. At a stocking rate of 10 acres per cow, roughly nine
cows or their equivalent would be displaced.
In today's cattle market for cow-calf producers, that would equal about $900
less in net income from the cattle operation (net of about $100/head).
"Is it worth $900 to develop good quail cover in order to enhance the
property for personal use of the quail? How about leasing access to the property
for quail hunting? A good quail-hunting lease could easily earn an income of
$3 to $6 per acre," Stevens says. "Whichever situation fits, you can
do the math."
###
| Image: |
 |
| Cutline: |
A visual of the Huggins 50:50 Model. |
###
The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation (www.noble.org), headquartered in Ardmore,
Okla., is a nonprofit organization conducting agricultural, forage improvement
and plant biology research; providing grants to non-profit charitable, educational
and health organizations; and assisting farmers and ranchers through educational
and consultative agricultural programs.
|