
Livestock: August 2001
|
Throughout the past decade, cattle producers have seen changes?some good, some
bad?that have dramatically altered the beef industry. Marker-assisted selection
techniques, expected progeny differences, individual identification, vertical
integration, and value-added products (the list goes on) are prevalent issues
that have evolved from seemingly far-fetched ideas of yesteryear.
These changes, to an extent, are a product of concerted research efforts that
have resulted in new and better production practices. However, a portion of
this change is due to modifications that cattle producers have made in their
management and marketing philosophies. Consequently, cattle producers now have
many more marketing opportunities than producers of the past, if they are
willing to take advantage of them.

Figure 1. Segments in today's beef industry:
QG = quality grade, YG = yield grade, ADG = average daily gain.
|
To say that the beef industry has been segmented and oftentimes opportunistic is
an understatement. Understandably, each entity's number one concern is its
bottom line. For all segments of the industry to be profitable, a majority of
the calves we produce have to make money four, and sometimes five, times
(figure 1). This situation is rarely the case and is the reason the "get while
the getting is good" attitude is so prevalent.
Throughout the past few years, we have heard a tremendous amount of talk about
beef cooperatives and alliances. These terms are generic and often confusing:
exactly what are they and what benefits do they offer the industry? Textbooks
define a cooperative as an organization for the production or marketing of
goods and an alliance as a close association for a common objective. Regardless
of the definition, both are alternative marketing approaches compared with some
of the industry's other, more traditional marketing programs, and both require
more input by the producer. However, depending upon your operational goals and
objectives, adopting these programs could add dollars to your bottom line.
A good example of a cooperative that is available to Oklahoma cattle producers
is the Oklahoma Quality Beef Network (OQBN), offered by the Oklahoma
Cattlemen's Association and the Oklahoma Extension Service. Participants are
required to follow association-defined, process-verified protocol regarding
weaning management, health regimens, and individual identification. Animals
consigned to this program will be marketed to meet a specific demand for
preconditioned calves that perform better and have lower health costs during
subsequent phases of production. Industry benefits from these programs include
consumer assurance and increased production efficiency; producer benefits are
the ability to market smaller lots of calves as bigger, more uniform production
units and the opportunity to receive compensation for on-farm management
practices that may already be in place. The first OQBN sale is slated for
November 7 at the Oklahoma West Livestock Market in El Reno, Oklahoma.
An alliance is generally formed to meet certain breed, health, management,
carcass, or niche market specifications and involves coordination among
industry segments through retained ownership. These specifications depend upon
the marketing objectives of the alliance, and premiums and discounts are given
according to how well a calf meets these specifications. Alliances that target
multiple specifications such as cutability, quality grade, and organic
production are available to producers with either small or large enterprises
because there is a wide range in the minimum number of head required to
participate.
The key to taking advantage of this marketing option is finding an alliance that
fits the calves you produce and then consistently producing those calves.
Therefore, questions you have to answer in order to participate in an alliance
are, Do I know how my cattle perform when they leave my ranch? and, Am I
willing to receive payment according to this performance? If the answer to the
first question is no, then the answer to the second question should be heck no.
However, if the answer to the first question is yes, then the answer to the
second question could be maybe, depending upon what your best marketing option
is. For example, according to the USDA Market News Service (week ending
6/17/01), the return for steers expected to grade 80 percent choice (sold live)
and those known to grade 80 percent choice (sold on the rail) was $953.69 and
$993.59 per head, respectively. You can use this information, along with the
knowledge of whether you produce calves that do or do not have the ability to
marble, to make about $40 per head by selectively marketing the type of calves
you produce.
Participation in an alliance is not a good idea when you have no information
regarding the quality of calves being produced. Services such as the Noble
Foundation's Retained Ownership Program (ROP) and Texas A&M's Ranch to Rail
Program are available to enable you to collect benchmark information pertaining
to calf performance and help you determine which alliance is right for you. The
number of cattle in the ROP has increased dramatically throughout the last five
years (figure 2), and the information that has been collected has helped
producers and foundation livestock specialists make decisions regarding
genetic, health, and breeding management.

Figure 2. Number of cattle consigned to the Noble Foundation's
Retained Ownership Program (ROP) during the last five years.
Regardless of whether you market through a beef cooperative or an alliance, the
price you receive will depend upon how you use knowledge. In a cooperative, you
are paid for providing knowledge that pertains to on-farm management practices
and is beneficial to upstream segments of the industry. Conversely, in an
alliance success depends upon obtaining knowledge from upstream industry
segments and implementing management and marketing strategies that complement
this knowledge. In either case, there are risks that do not accompany
traditional marketing methods, and information has to be exchanged within the
beef industry. However, both of these marketing approaches remove you from
selling on the averages and will allow you to be a knowledge-based price
negotiator instead of a price taker when it comes time to make a marketing
decision.
|