
Livestock: March 2003
|
During the
last week of January, 2003, I attended the National Cattleman's
Beef Association's (NCBA) national convention in Nashville, Tenn.
There were many highlights of the convention however,
I would like to focus on just one. This convention offers what
may be the premier tradeshow associated with the cattle industry.
I spent all of one morning and part of an afternoon taking it
in.
One of the
things that really caught my attention was the number of companies
offering various means of cattle identification and information
management. Now, we are all aware that there are multiple companies
offering visual identification in the form of some type of ear
tag. There were at least 12 such companies displaying their wares
at the NCBA tradeshow.
The small,
typically round electronic individual identification (EID) tags
are being offered by a number of companies as well. In fact,
we as participants in this convention were tracked through the
trade show by one vendor who gave us each one of these EID tags
and strategically placed readers throughout the trade show.
What you may
not be aware of is the new upcoming technology that is now available
for cattle identification. There is a company out of Greeley,
Colo., called EZ-ID that now offers EID in the form of a rumen
bolus that can be administered with a conventional balling gun.
This bolus lodges in the animal's reticulum and remains there
throughout its life. As the animal goes by a reader panel, it
can be electronically identified.
Retinal imaging
is another form of identification that was the stuff of science
fiction just a few years ago, but now it has become a reality
in the beef business. A Fort Collins, Colo., based company, Optibrand,
is now offering a cattle retinal imaging system that is hand
held, incorporates global positioning technology, and seems to
be surprisingly affordable.
Why all this
emphasis on individual identification? I think there are at least
two reasons. First, there is more of an attempt to quantify individual
animal performance in the beef cattle industry now than at any
time in the past. If we are going to quantify individual performance,
we must be able to measure it, and before we can measure individual
performance, we have to be able to identify individuals. Historically,
this is where the beef industry has had difficulty. With the
new technology available at a relatively low price, we as an
industry are quickly moving beyond this pitfall. The future is
truly exciting in terms of the measurement of individual animal
performance.
The second
and probably more urgent reason may be found in the new farm
bill passed this last year. Country of origin labeling (COOL)
will become a reality for the beef industry. Whether an individual
producer likes it, hates it or doesn't know about it, it sounds
like we better be prepared for it. By Sept. 30, 2004, food retailers
must inform consumers about the country of origin of "covered
commodities." That includes beef, pork, lamb, fish, peanuts,
fruits and vegetables. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
was handed a tough assignment by Congress when it approved the
country of origin labeling provisions as part of the 2002 Farm
Bill. USDA's Agriculture Marketing Service is charged with developing
the COOL voluntary guidelines, which were made available for
public comment on Oct. 11, 2002. Stakeholders have a 180-day
period, until April 9, 2003, to submit comments on these guidelines,
which could ultimately serve as the blue print for mandatory
labeling on Sept. 30, 2004.
In the case
of beef and pork, only animals that are born, raised and slaughtered
in the United States may be designated as having a U.S. country
of origin. How much record keeping will have to be done? How
will it be implemented? Who will pay for it? The precedent has
been set that the party with the least power in the market chain
typically antes up. So, don't bet against it being you, the producer,
who foots at least some of the bill. One thing seems obvious you
may have to have some means of individual identification to help
with this process. Fortunately, whether it is for individual
performance measurement or abiding by new government regulation,
innovative technology is available.
|