|
In light of the recent discovery in Washington of a Canadian-born Holstein
cow that tested positive for BSE, the need for a national animal identification
system has become of paramount importance. In fact, Ron DeHaven, the USDA's
chief veterinary officer, spoke at the National Cattlemen's Beef Association
convention and said, "The BSE incident underscored the need for a national
animal ID system that allows for rapid trace-back."
How the United States will implement a national identification system has not
yet been determined. However, the framework is being assembled by the National
Identification Development Team. Their draft document is called the United States
Animal Identification Plan (USAIP) and can be viewed at www.usaip.com. The executive
summary of this plan states: "
an industry-state-federal partnership,
aided by the National Institute for Animal Agriculture, was formed in 2002 to
more uniformly coordinate a national animal identification plan. This resulting
plan, requested by the United States Animal Health Association (USAHA) and facilitated
by the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, was formulated
in 2003 for presentation at the October 2003 annual meeting of the USAHA. More
than 100 animal industry and state-federal government professionals representing
more than 70 allied associations and organizations collectively assessed and
suggested workable improvements to the plan to meet future US animal identification
needs." This team has identified three phases that they recommend in a
transition to a national identification system. These phases are:
- All states have a premises identification system in place by July 2004;
unique individual animal or group/lot numbers to be available for issuance
by February 2005.
- All cattle, swine and small ruminants possess individual or group/lot identification
for interstate movement by July 2005.
- All animals of the remaining species/industries (including bison, swine,
sheep, goats, camelids (alpacas and llamas), cervids (deer and elk), poultry
(eight species including game birds) and aquaculture (eleven species) be in
similar compliance by July 2006.
As you can see, work on a national identification system has been ongoing for
several years. The urgency from recent occurrences in the cattle industry will
likely expedite the implementation.
Understandably, producers have numerous questions and concerns, but many of
these concerns cannot be accurately addressed at this time. However, the USAIP
Web site has a frequently asked questions section (http://usaip.info/faq.htm)
that addresses some issues. Here are a few of the more common questions from
the USAIP site:
What are the benefits for producers in adopting the U.S. Animal Identification
Plan?
The adoption of a national identification system will help secure the health
of the national herd. The program will provide producers and animal health officials
with the infrastructure to improve efforts in current disease eradication and
control, protect against foreign animal disease outbreaks and provide infrastructure
to address threats from deliberate introduction of disease. The industry may
integrate the standards and technologies defined in the USAIP with their management
systems and performance recording programs. The utilization of the same ID technologies
for both regulatory and industry programs allows for the development of a more
cost-effective and user-friendly system for the producer. Producers can also
benefit from additional animal identification information obtained to improve
production efficiencies and add value to their products. However, the information
systems are completely separate; production data will not be transmitted to
nor maintained in the national identification databases.
Who will pay for the plan?
It is anticipated that the federal government and all industry stakeholders
will share in the costs of an identification system.
What forms of identification will be used?
The form of animal identification used is intended to optimize accuracy, promote
efficient information transfer and be practical and effective in its application
for individual species and/or industries. Species groups will have the choice
of designing a system that may or may not use accompanying visible ID. For example,
the cattle industry plans to use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology
using an eartag attachment. Electronic identification may be necessary for efficient
and accurate data collection and animal tracking in some species or in particular
animal movement scenarios. Official identification tags will not replace management
ear tags unless the species groups establish those options. Ultimately, it is
anticipated that technological advances will allow for one tag or ID device
that performs multiple functions. Implants (i.e., microchips) may be permitted
for certain species in which no other form of ID is suitable and assuming that
the implant site has been approved by the FDA and FSIS relative to ease of discovery
at slaughter when appropriate.
Where do I get an official ID tag or device?
Currently the distribution mechanism for ID devices is being discussed. It has
not been decided where and how a producer can obtain official ID devices at
this time. Different species will have different requirements in regards to
the type of device that can be used; however, standards in regards to RFID technology
and code structure and retention will ensure that various ID devices can be
read with RFID readers that meet the same RFID technology standards.
At this point, there is probably not a question as to if the United States
will have a national identification system, but more of a question of when and
how a national identification system will be implemented. The best advice I
can give you at this time is stay tuned, keep informed, offer constructive input
and maintain a positive approach to this ongoing process for the good of the
entire industry.
|