![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a horticulture consultant, I'm keenly aware of the ever-increasing diversity of the agricultural landscape in the Noble Foundation's service area. Many of our client cooperators are establishing alternative crop enterprises such as small fruits, including grapes and blackberries, peaches, pecans and market gardens to supplement their incomes. With increased crop diversity, there is an accompanying increased risk of crop injury due to herbicide drift. Drift damage to alternative crops is a common occurrence in southern Oklahoma and north Texas, where herbicides are routinely applied to pastures and rangeland. I'm personally aware of several incidences where herbicide drift damaged vegetable plantings during the 2004 growing season.
While it is ultimately the responsibility of the applicator to prevent off-target damage by an herbicide, the grower of alternative crops also has responsibility in drift management. Dr. Case Medlin, Extension weed specialist with the Plant and Soil Sciences Department at Oklahoma State University, has developed a list of best management practices for preventing herbicide drift onto susceptible crops. A few of these practices relevant to alternative crop producers include:
One of the keys to continued crop diversity and the economic prosperity of area agriculture is keeping an open line of communication among alternative crops growers and pesticide applicators. For a comprehensive list of best management practices for preventing herbicide drift onto susceptible crops, contact Case Medlin at (405) 744-9588 or visit http://www.weedscience.okstate.edu/. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
© 1997-2008 by The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||