![]() |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Preface Crabgrass: A Synopsis Introduction History Species Crabgrass as Forage Using Crabgrass Crabgrass Cultivars Establishment Tillage and No-Tillage Management Soil Fertility Considerations Forage Production Potential Stock Performance Use Volunteer Stand Management Adaptation Literature Available Development, Naming, and Release of the "Red River" Crabgrass Variety Abstract Introduction History of Varietal Development Methods of Research and Development Results Official Naming and Release Seed Availability Literature Cited 'Red River' Crabgrass: Why and How it Happened Historical Prespective Species and Ecotypes There is more to a Grass than Yield Area of Use More Information is Available Official Seed Release Summary Crabgrass Produces Top Quality Warm Season Hay Crabgrass is the Winter Pasture for the Summer Crabgrass for High Quality, Highh Production, Warm-Season Forage Introduction History of Use and Geographic Adaptation Specific Adaptation Production Input Practices Forage Quality Aspects Examples of Crabgrass Forage Uses Forage and Stock Yields Crabgrass Variety Development and Literature Literature Cited Average Daily Gain On 'Red River' Crabgrass Crabgrass as a Variable and Flexible Forage Crop History of ADG on Crabgrass Management of This Trial Forage Production Management A Brief History of Production on This Unit Livestock Management Grazing Management Weather Considerations Results Grazing Management Results The Mistakes We Made Crabgrass Forage Yields as Influenced by Forage Harvesting Regimes Abstract Introduction Procedures Results and Discussion Double Crop Winter Pastures by Using Improved Crabgrass Switching from Winter Pasture to Crabgrass Broadcasting Crabgrass Seed into Annual Winter Pastures to Start a Crabgrass-Winter Pasture Double Crop Fall Planting Rye into Crabgrass in a Low-Till Approach Summer Annual/Winter Annual Rotation of Grazing and Forage Systems Improving Overall Forage Quality by Adding Higher Quality Warm-Season Grasses to the Bermudagrass Sward Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Bermudagrass or Bahiagrass and Crabgrass Mixtures in Practice Managing for Volunteer Stands in Crabgrass Hay Meadows Emergence Depth of 'Red River' Crabgrass in Volunteer Stands Introduction Methods and Materials Results and Discussion Practical Application Literature Cited Planting Rye in 'Red River' Crabgrass Managing 'Red River' Crabgrass for Upper Level Forage and Beef Yield Materials and Methods Results and Discussion 'Red River' Crabgrass in Grazier Uses Summary The Effect of Seeding Rates on First-Season Crabgrass Development Material and Methods Results and Discussion Summary of the Research Summary Feed Value and Management Characteristics of 'Red River' Crabgrass Seed for Planting and Volunteer Stands 'Red River' Crabgrass Forage Production with Irrigation and Fertilization |
by R. L. Dalrymple and Ronald L. Mitchell
Harvesting regimens were tested to determine the influence of residue height and stage of plant growth at harvest on crabgrass forage yields. In general, the more advanced the green plant growth stage and the taller the residue (up to 6 inches), the higher the forage yield. Forage quality was inferior when seed heads were mature. IntroductionCrabgrass (Digitaria ciliaris, D. sanguinalis, and other species) is a forage plant. It is a naturalized volunteer plant throughout the semiarid to humid mild and temperate zones of the world, including every state except possibly Alaska. It is the most useful forage alternative from Nebraska to the east and south coasts. It has some practical use to the north of this area as well. The forage responds very well to moisture and can be grown where irrigation is a choice. The forage production and quality of crabgrass was recognized several decades ago, but there was no specific management information available. We began to research, evaluate, and demonstrate such management, and this is a brief report of one of those studies. ProceduresThe experiment had a six-treatment, three-replicate randomized block design. The blocks were set in a circular pattern to facilitate irrigation with one Rainbird rotating sprinkler head. The harvesting-regimen treatments were as follows:
treatment 2: harvested to a 3-inch residue at 8 to 10 inches of growth treatment 3: harvested to a 3-inch residue during the preboot to few head stage treatment 4: harvested to a 3-inch residue during early green head stage treatment 5: harvested to a 3-inch residue at seed maturity treatment 6: harvested to a 6-inch residue at seed maturity All treatments were managed to simulate approaches to rotational grazing. All treatments were harvested to a 1-inch residue at the end of the year to provide the same residue heights for all treatments at harvest termination. Since crabgrass is an annual, the short final residue is appropriate. The initial plots were established with 10 pounds of pure live seed per acre from a good type of naturalized crabgrass (D. ciliaris) on an excellent fresh seedbed. This high seeding rate was used to assure rapid development and relatively dense initial stands. Second-season stands were from volunteer seed produced during the first season. The soil on the study area was a Wilson silt loam of moderate depth. Plants were fertilized at 67-46-60 pounds of actual N-P2O5-K2O per acre early in the season. The first fertilization was done soon after stand emergence. A second application of 67-0-0 pounds of actual nitrogen per acre was applied after the first harvests in each treatment. A total of 134-46-60 pounds of N-P2O5-K2O per acre was applied each of the two years of the study. Plants were irrigated as needed to keep the forage green and growing, but not fully irrigated. Results and DiscussionThe data show, in general, that crabgrass forage yields increase as harvest is delayed and recovery period increases, allowing plants to age (tables 1 through 6).1 The data also show that as residue height increases, so does total season yield, if the last harvest's residue is uniform and the minimum height. There are differences in production uniformity (tables 1 through 3). Two extreme examples are treatment 1 (short residue) compared with treatment 6 (seldom harvested; tall residue). Some of these data were converted to estimated beef yield per acre and other information via conversion factors (table 7). These simulated controlled rotational grazing figures illustrate the influence of different harvesting regimens (rotational grazing) on potential beef yield and cost, the "real ranch" reason for the research. 1. Dr. Bill Ward, Statistician, Oklahoma State University, assisted with statistical analysis.
|
||||||||||
|
© 1997-2008 by The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc.
|
|||||||||||