
Economics: March 2000
|
Noble Foundation - The Beef Industry
Landowners commonly use cattle to merchandise the forage or grass they grow.
Once they decide to sell the grass that way, they must also decide what class
of cattle to use and what time of year sales will bring the most profit. A few
of the cattle-class choices include (1) a mature cow herd, (2) stocker cows,
(3) winter stockers, either steers or heifers, (4) summer stockers, either
steers or heifers, and (5) thin breeding bulls. Add weight options to the
stocker cattle categories and the list becomes even longer. All these classes
may not be available to every landowner because of management expertise or
location. We are not going to analyze the profitability of each enterprise.
However, if you have questions concerning the potential profitability of a
particular cattle enterprise, any of the economists at the Noble Foundation can
help you.
This article discusses a little about the history of the beef industry and a
little about the cattle best suited as a vehicle for grass sales. For the last
130 years, cattle production cycles have been predictable. A production cycle
usually lasts from nine to eleven years. In the first half of the cycle, the
liquidation phase, numbers decline. Producers sell cattle because of general
unprofitability at the cow-calf level. Once enough cows-and I cannot say what
number is enough-have been sold for slaughter, calf prices rebound,
profitability returns to the cow-calf sector, and cow numbers start increasing
because cow-calf producers start holding heifers for breeding rather than
selling them. This phenomenon is referred to as the building phase of the
cycle. During this time, cow-calf producers profit most because calf prices are
higher. They sell fewer calves and keep more heifer calves for cow stock. If
the producer raises too many calves for cows, the calf supply increases in the
long run, calf prices drop, and the cattle cycle continues to be alive and
well.
Where are we in the current cattle cycle? On January 28, 2000, the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) published their estimate of the U.S. cattle
population as of January 1. Beef cows numbered 33,546 million head, a 1 percent
drop from the year before, and the fourth consecutive decline. Popular opinion
by outlook economists indicates this will be the last year for declining
numbers. If so, the liquidation phase of the cattle cycle has ended, triggering
the building phase. Remember, the building phase is usually the most profitable
for cow-calf producers. The profitability, however, depends somewhat on when
the cow-calf producer chooses to purchase cows. If higher calf prices or their
anticipation causes landowners to pay so much for replacement cows that some
profit cannot be generated before the next downturn in calf prices, then the
window of opportunity for this cycle may have closed. However, replacement cows
are still available at reasonable prices.
There are two major
components to price discovery-supply and demand. The USDA estimate of current
cattle population indicates the supply has been reduced, which increases
prices. The other component, demand, is an estimate of how much beef will be
eaten at various price levels. For approximately twenty years, beef demand has
been declining. In 1999, beef demand increased, and consumers bought more beef
at higher prices. Therefore, both components of price support higher cattle
prices for the next two to four years. Costs still matter, but better cattle
prices are expected.
Higher prices for calves are not necessarily perceived as a blessing if you plan
to sell your grass through yearlings. However, a closer look indicates that the
profit potential for yearlings when prices are higher can also be better. Table
1 depicts two situations, one with low cattle prices and one with high. If you
follow the numbers across, you will notice the expected margin is greater for
yearlings when prices are higher if buy-sell margins and the cost of gain stay
the same. The two examples assume the 300 pounds of gain cost a producer $80
whether cattle prices are high or low. The buy-sell margin is also held
constant at $20 per hundredweight (cwt). When cattle prices are high, a
producer might expect $60 more per head. Please keep in mind, however, that the
margin between calves and feeders does not always stay constant as depicted in
the graph at right.
Landowners and grass growers have several good animal-class options. Not often
do we have these opportunities.
| Table 1. Expected Margins at Low and High Cattle Prices |
| |
Purchase
Weight
|
Purchase
Price
|
Purchase
Cost/Head
|
Cost
of
Gain/Head
|
Total
Cattle & Feed
Cost/Head
|
Sell
Weight
|
Sell
Price
|
Total
Sell
Value
|
Expected
Margin
|
| Low Prices |
400 lbs.
|
$0.80/lb.
|
$320
|
$80
|
$400
|
700 lbs.
|
$0.60/lb.
|
$420
|
$20
|
| High Prices |
400 lbs.
|
$1.00/lb.
|
$400
|
$80
|
$480
|
700 lbs.
|
$0.80/lb.
|
$560
|
$80
|
|